Has the software been verified against known problems? Could one meet the requirements of the Code with manual calculations? Traditional views of large enterprise development see information siloed throughout different departments. I gotta agree with TGS on this one. It’s easy to join and it’s free.
|Date Added:||11 June 2010|
|File Size:||23.55 Mb|
|Operating Systems:||Windows NT/2000/XP/2003/2003/7/8/10 MacOS 10/X|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Reasons such softwafe off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework. I did a run on NozzlePro last night to simulate what the vendor was doing and carefully read his report.
Simply put, if you are blindly accepting that everything that comes out of a particular piece of software is valid, based solely on the name of the software, then that would be troublesome at best, and gets into the realm of lawyers at worst. WRC simplifications for pad reinforced rectangular lug attachments are fraught with potentially sottware errors.
Criticality of the application is a major consideration when deciding whether or not to run a finite element calculation. I’ll get down from my soap-box now. Isthill – I don’t think that this is a “support” softwage – rather a question from an engineer who is reviewing a vendor’s calculations. Most of these experiments were performed on a single-size piping run.
Further, I don’t really care whether or not any software has been “verified” or “validated” against known problems – I’m more concerned about whether or not the analyst has been “verified” or “validated” against this specific problem. What role does the digital twin play in the development of new digital business models? Do I need to make myself any more clear? Join your peers on the Internet’s largest technical engineering professional community. And, particularly for FEA, any validation would be essentially worthless, because as I have said again and againit’s not the software – it’s the analyst – hence asking all the questions.
Traditional views of large enterprise development see information siloed throughout different departments.
Paulin Research Group NozzlePRO for Intergraph PV Elite and CAESAR II
Systems that do not cycle are less prone to failure than systems that cycle daily. Download Now Traditional views of large enterprise development see information siloed throughout different departments.
Also, bravo for performing an independent “check”. I know that I am proud to answer all of the questions that I listed before – it’s in answering these questions that I can “validate” or “verify” myself. Who doesn’t like it when people ask intelligent questions about your work. I have a Div. I think you should direct your general questions to FE-pipe. Also, ask a lot of “why” questions – why did you choose to perform the analysis this way – why did you choose this mesh density – etc.
The analyst can run each model type and compare results to determine the stability and accuracy of the solution.
Like I said before, a good analyst will be more than happy to answer all of these questions. Therefore, it spftware able to accurately establish consistent safety factors for analysis. How can companies systematically digitalize their business processes and information flows? This is basically the type of problem that drove the nuclear engineers to using computers and numerical methods back in the “good ‘ole days”.
Higher earthquake load requirements can make conservative design assumptions costly.
Download Now What role does the digital twin play in the development of new digital business models? Here’s the back ground.
For even more accurate evaluation of loads and displacements on the nozzle and in the piping system, users can pipe away from a piping junction on a vessel head or cylinder to evaluate the effect of the thermal expansion on a nozzle. As a part of a company that receives 3rd party reports all the time, I can tell you that we have neither nozzl/pro time nor the budget to validate every piece of nkzzle/pro out there.
Paulin Research Group Software Verification
Are you an Engineering professional? I think I now understand what was done but I am having a hard time accepting his report. Powered by Nodus Solutions.
I assume then that one must do a 2-D thermal analysis to get a temperature gradiant before you run NozzlePro. Red Flag This Post Please let us know here why this post is softwaee.